Thursday, October 27, 2011

Should We Occupy?

A topic that has been bothering me for the past few days are these “Occupy ______” protests that seem to be happening in many large cities of the United States (and random cities around the world too). While I’m totally in favor of protesting and getting your opinion heard, I find these protests in particular a bit disappointingly useless. Of course, this is when my inner moral voice starts asking me, “Don’t you want corruption to end?” and while I may say yes, I highly doubt corruption will stop. Let me explain.

United States was created on a capitalist economy. Thus, it seems a bit unfair to me to take away the money of select individuals just because they have more money than most protestors combined. If this nation is based on a capitalist economy, wouldn’t it be fair for those individuals that might or might not have worked hard to make such large amounts of money in their life to keep it? I think most financial issues in this country and in the state of Texas are based on the average individual’s inability to come up with a financial plan and to not bite off more than they can chew. I’ll admit that inflation keeps raising prices pretty much globally and that can make purchasing goods more expensive such as grocery shopping. However, it doesn’t mean everyone has to have the latest phone or the latest gadget if that means suffering financially. I would hope that the past and present recession would’ve taught this nation that people should be rational as to what they can or can’t afford. So to me, the inability to not spend and save your money seems to also be another underlying cause of this huge gap of income that’s present these days. Increases in population also contribute greatly to the elite’s income. The more people buy, the more money they’ll end up having. While corruption is rampant, there would have to be significant amounts of evidence in order to take any of these wealthy people to trial.

I will admit I still feel a bit confused about all of these protests. It seems everywhere I’ve seen protests, they protest against so many things. All the noise created from these protests creates much confusion and it gets to a point where I end up asking myself, what in the world are they even protesting against? Corruption? Greed? The fundamental economic system by which this nation was created? Their inability to not bite off more than they can chew and then blame their debt on others? The Health Care Reform? Terrorism? The lack of jobs? High rents? Inflation? I know this nation has problems and people don’t have jobs, but when the main focus doesn’t seem concise, that’s when I start to get a bit bothered. As optimistic as I wish I could be with these protests, I highly doubt the wealthy will voluntarily give their excess money to the masses. No one can end corruption and greed. It’s a vicious cycle. Once someone from the 99% enters the 1%, unfortunately the lure of money will convert them into the same individuals they once protested against.

The only way to help end these people’s outrage would be by creating more jobs. However, with a split Congress, it’ll be difficult to pass any law. As already seen, the Republican majority in the House of Representatives already voted against the Job Reform President Obama wanted to pass. Thankfully Texas has been able to keep jobs and create several more in order to help feed more families with a disposable income. One can only hope other states will be able to provide people with more jobs as well.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Austin City Council Increasing Election Spending

The latest in Austin news is that the Austin City Council decided to do what they wanted. Who's surprised by politicians getting the last word? I'm not. Blue Dot Blues' writer MJ Samuelson wrote about how the city council refused to change the council elections to November 2012 instead of May of the same year. (MJ Samuelson. Austin City Council actively disenfranchising voters. Blue Dot Blues. Tuesday, October 11, 2011.)

While both Austin ISD and the Austin Community College district agreed that moving the elections to November would be a good idea, the city council thought otherwise. Samuelson believes that the Austin City Council is pretty ridiculous for thinking that leaving the elections in May is anywhere near a good idea. She states that leaving the elections in May would cost the Austin taxpayers around $1.2 million (not including the $500,000 estimated run-off). A different source I checked for research had stated that moving the elections to November would cost about $900,000. I mean, no big deal, right? It's only about a $300,000 difference that could've gone to more important departments, like say, education? But clearly Texas isn't big on the education department nowadays.

Anyways, back to Samuelson. She believes that this may be a way for the city council to protect themselves from "voters [that] aren't smart enough to grasp all the issues on the long general election ballot in November." We all know politicians will do whatever they can to win, so that comes as no surprise to me. They just don't seem to care about how much easier it'll be to inform the public on when elections will be so they can all perform their jobs as responsible citizens. Seems like the only way for uninformed voters to make any change in when elections will be held is by doing what we do best. Protest. If you want your voice heard, make it heard. Samuelson's blog post provides several ways we can all get our voice heard, and hopefully save the state $300,000 and our cars some gas from having to travel to voting sites several times throughout next year.

As far as the research I’ve done on the subject, Samuelson seems to be on track. Her figures match up to those of major newspapers, such as the Austin American Statesman, as well as other Texas based blogs like Empower Texans. Besides, if she’s trying to get Austinites more informed and motivated to change the way politics is working these days in their own city, I’d think she was pretty credible. I completely agree with her, if we want any change, we’ll have to work for it.